Discussions

In the increasingly mobile economy of the 21st century, career opportunities often demand geographic flexibility. However, for divorced parents, a job offer in another state triggers a legal crisis that threatens to upend the delicate balance of their children's lives. Jos Family Law reports on the "move-away" phenomenon, the most contentious area of family law litigation. When one parent decides to leave the area, the concept of shared physical custody collides with the constitutional right to travel, forcing the court to choose one primary home over the other.

To understand the stakes, we must define What is 50 50 custody currently? It is a lifestyle dependent on proximity. It works because the parents live in the same school district. When that proximity is broken, the 50/50 arrangement is legally considered "frustrated." The court cannot order a parent not to move, but it can order the child to stay. This sets the stage for a "de novo" custody hearing, where the judge must essentially decide custody from scratch based on the best interests of the child in the new circumstances.

The journalistic narrative of these cases often focuses on the "good faith" of the move. Is the parent moving for a legitimate job promotion or to alienate the child from the other parent? The court conducts a deep inquiry into the motives. If the move is viewed as a tactic to disrupt the co-parenting bond, the judge is likely to grant custody to the non-moving parent. Conversely, if the move improves the family's standard of living, the court might allow the child to go, provided a robust visitation schedule is established for the remaining parent.

These cases often involve "custody evaluators"—psychologists appointed by the court to interview the family and issue a recommendation. Their report becomes the central document in the litigation. They assess which parent is more likely to facilitate a relationship with the absent parent. In the zero-sum game of relocation, the "friendly parent" doctrine often tips the scale. The parent who demonstrates a willingness to keep the other parent involved, despite the distance, often wins the primary custody designation.

Ultimately, a move-away case ends the era of shared daily parenting. It ushers in a new reality of long-distance parenting, requiring virtual visitation and substantial travel budgets to maintain the bond.

To manage the complex narrative of a relocation case, contact Jos Family Law. https://josfamilylaw.com/